The Perspective of Different Stakeholder-Groups Involved in Teacher Training upon the Professionalism of Teachers
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.11576/hlz-6635Keywords:
Lehrkräftebildung, Praxissemester, Kohärenz, Theorie-Praxis-Beziehung, Akteur*innenAbstract
Questions regarding the design of teacher training have always been discussed from different perspectives. This discussion’s focus differs depending on the institutions and stakeholders involved in teacher training. This causes tensions between theory and practice, which is a topic that has recently been the subject of intensive research, not only within the “Qualitätsoffensive Lehrerbildung”. Since different approaches and perspectives on professionalism and professionalization of teachers need to be orchestrated in order to design coordinated (initial) teacher training, it is necessary to know these perspectives and to identify differences and similarities. In the study described here, 19 interviews were conducted with instructors from the institutions involved in the practical semester. A qualitative content analysis in a deductively created category system, which depicts the theoretical approaches of teacher training (competence approach, structural theoretical approach, (professional) biographical approach, personality approach), revealed indications of the respective understandings of professionalism and professionalization. In addition to the different perspectives of the stakeholder groups, a typification shows that the perspectives of the mentors at the schools differ greatly both among themselves and in comparison to the other stakeholders. This can result in these actors setting different priorities in their mentoring and thus creating an awareness of incoherence among the students. A qualification program for all the involved instructors could provide a coherence-creating forum for exchange. Based on the identified common themes such as reflection, practical experience and the interlinking of theory and practice, such a qualification program can be designed according to the core practices approach.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Rosi Ritter, Anna Lena Erpenbach, Kathrin Fussangel

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Sämtliche Inhalte der HLZ werden freigegeben unter der Creative-Commons-Lizenz Namensnennung, Weitergabe unter gleichen Bedingungen, Version 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0). Die Urheber_innen und die Rechteinhaber_innen der in der HLZ veröffentlichten Beiträge gewähren grundsätzlich allen Nutzer_innen unwiderruflich das freie, weltweite Zugangsrecht zu diesen Veröffentlichungen. Unter der Bedingung, dass Autor_innen und Herausgeber_innen gemäß der Zitationshinweise sowie die Lizenz als »Lizenz: CC BY-SA 4.0« einschließlich der untenstehenden Lizenz-URL genannt werden, dürfen die Beiträge der HLZ vervielfältigt, weitergereicht und auf beliebige Weise genutzt werden, auch kommerziell und ebenso online wie in gedruckter oder anderer Form. Auch die Bearbeitung ist erlaubt unter der zusätzlichen Bedingung, dass das neu entstandene Werk als Bearbeitung gekennzeichnet wird und im Falle einer Veröffentlichung unter derselben Lizenz wie in der HLZ freigegeben wird.