Secondary-School Students’ Views on Pull-out as an Opportunity for Reflective Practices in Inclusive Teacher Education
A Cased-Based Approach within a (Collaborative) Online Learning Format
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.11576/hlz-4045Keywords:
inclusive teacher education, cased-based learning, secondary-school student’s view, pull-out, collaboration, online learningAbstract
In this paper we present a concept as well as case materials for a digital (collaborative) case-based approach within pre-service inclusive teacher education. Based on the BMBF funded project ReLInk, this was developed following the changeover to online teaching and learning in summer semester 2020. This online cased-based learning approach was carried out within a collaborative format between special and general education courses of the universities of Aachen and Hanover as well as within an advanced secondary education course at Göttingen university. In the first week, students engaged with case materials individually. Based on this, online meetings in small groups took place in the following week. Drawing on empirical results of the project ReLInk the case-based learning focuses on secondary students’ views on pull-out situations in the context of ability grouping linked to special education need categorization. In accordance to previous research, we refer to an understanding which emphasizes the role of school in (re)producing difference. With our cased-based learning we aim to encourage reflective practices in pre-service teacher education which address the construction of difference in schools. While our concept for cased-based learning is inspired by Grounded Theory, we do not concentrate on research methods or research-oriented learning. By thus, our concept can be regarded as a mixed-form with respect to given distinctions between cased-based learning formats. By focusing on pull-out, we join current attempts to increase considerations of (inter-)professional collaboration within pre-service teacher-training. In our paper, we present materials, tasks and impulses as well as students’ feedback.
-
Abstract1082
-
Beitrag 697
-
Online-Supplement 1 426
-
Online-Supplement 2 277
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Ann-Kathrin Arndt, Jonas Becker, Sina-Mareen Köhler, Jessica M. Löser, Michael Urban, Rolf Werning

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Sämtliche Inhalte der HLZ werden freigegeben unter der Creative-Commons-Lizenz Namensnennung, Weitergabe unter gleichen Bedingungen, Version 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0). Die Urheber_innen und die Rechteinhaber_innen der in der HLZ veröffentlichten Beiträge gewähren grundsätzlich allen Nutzer_innen unwiderruflich das freie, weltweite Zugangsrecht zu diesen Veröffentlichungen. Unter der Bedingung, dass Autor_innen und Herausgeber_innen gemäß der Zitationshinweise sowie die Lizenz als »Lizenz: CC BY-SA 4.0« einschließlich der untenstehenden Lizenz-URL genannt werden, dürfen die Beiträge der HLZ vervielfältigt, weitergereicht und auf beliebige Weise genutzt werden, auch kommerziell und ebenso online wie in gedruckter oder anderer Form. Auch die Bearbeitung ist erlaubt unter der zusätzlichen Bedingung, dass das neu entstandene Werk als Bearbeitung gekennzeichnet wird und im Falle einer Veröffentlichung unter derselben Lizenz wie in der HLZ freigegeben wird.